![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() Best Evidence: VBAC or Repeat C-SectionBest evidence:
When making important maternity decisions, women should have
information from the best available research about the safety and
effectiveness of different choices. In general, we can be most
confident about results of systematic reviews that summarize randomized
controlled trials (or RCTs, a type of study). Unfortunately, for many decisions we must rely on less definitive research; and many important questions even in the case of widely used drugs, tests and procedures have hardly been studied at all. Although this situation is discouraging, an awareness of weak or missing evidence can help you make informed choices about care. What is the bottom line? What problems are more common with repeat cesarean birth versus vaginal birth? What problems are more common with vaginal birth compared with repeat cesarean birth? What are some ways that a planned c-section may differ from an unplanned c-section? What is the added likelihood that the scar will give way (uterine rupture) during a VBAC labor? What is the added likelihood that the baby will die as a result of the scar giving way (uterine rupture) during a VBAC labor? What is the added likelihood of the scar giving way (uterine rupture) with any of the following factors listed below? What is the added likelihood of the scar giving way (uterine rupture) with twin pregnancy or the use of external cephalic version (turning a baby in a buttocks- or feet-first (breech) position to a head-first position by manipulating the woman's belly)? What is the added likelihood that a woman planning VBAC will require a hysterectomy compared with a woman planning repeat c-section? How may a growing number of uterine scars affect future pregnancies and births? This page presents results of recent systematic reviews and other studies that can help women compare risks of planned vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) and of planned c-section (see references at end of page). While more high-quality studies are needed, a large body of research already exists and sheds light on these questions for those who need guidance now. When deciding whether to plan a VBAC or a repeat cesarean, it is important to understand the full range of risks to you and your baby. This means comparing the short- and long-term risks of cesarean surgery and risks of accumulating cesarean surgery scars to mothers and babies on the one hand, to the risk that the uterine scar will give way (uterine rupture) and lead to problems and a few risks that are worse for vaginal birth generally. Even if you do not plan to have more children, you should be aware of risks of multiple cesarean scars to future pregnancies and babies. Many women change their mind and decide to become pregnant again or continue with unplanned pregnancies. What is the bottom line?If you do not have a clear and compelling need for a cesarean in the present pregnancy, having a VBAC rather than a repeat c-section is likely to be:
KEY MESSAGES ABOUT VBAC VS. REPEAT CESAREAN SECTION:See details about scar-related effects after the following summary lists.Despite limitations of the best available research, the following conclusions seem clear:
What problems are more common with repeat cesarean birth versus vaginal birth?When weighing planned VBAC versus planned c-section, the focus is often on potential problems with the uterine scar in labor in the present pregnancy. But this results in an incomplete picture. Women and their caregivers should consider all of the risks that differ between vaginal birth and cesarean section. Some of these are short-term risks like infection and bleeding while others are longer-term risks, including problems in future pregnancies. Summarized here are some of the many extra risks associated with cesarean surgery. The next question reviews advantages of cesarean birth. (In Best Evidence: C-Section, you can find a detailed comparison of risks of cesarean and vaginal birth, including how likely these problems are to occur.)Most of what we know about these risks comes from studies of cesarean in general, not planned repeat c-section. Available research suggests that some of these risks may be lessened when the c-section is planned. The question: What are some ways that a planned c-section may differ from an unplanned c-section? addresses these differences. As you consider these, keep in mind that on average, 3 out of 4 women who labor after a c-section will give birth vaginally with care that encourages and supports VBAC (and fewer than 1 in 100 will experience the scar giving way). Even in cases where women are told they have a low chance of having a VBAC, if given the chance many or even most give birth vaginally.
What problems are more common with vaginal birth compared with repeat cesarean birth?C-section offers advantages in a few areas, primarily during the recovery period after birth. Some practices used with vaginal birth, such as episiotomy, are associated with pelvic floor problems. It is wrong to conclude at this time that vaginal birth itself causes such problems. See the Pregnancy Topic Preventing Pelvic Floor Dysfunction.
What are some ways that a planned c-section may differ from an unplanned c-section?A planned c-section offers some advantages over an unplanned c-section that occurs during labor. For example, there is a lower risk of surgical injuries and of infections. The emotional impact of a cesarean that is planned in advance appears to be similar to or only somewhat worse than a vaginal birth. By contrast, unplanned cesareans can take a greater emotional toll. In addition, a woman planning repeat cesarean surgery would almost certainly be less likely to experience difficulty breastfeeding if she had breastfed before or to have negative feelings for her baby compared with a first-time mother having an unplanned cesarean. Nonetheless, a planned cesarean still involves the risks associated with major surgery. And both planned and unplanned cesareans result in a uterine scar, which increases risk for serious concerns for mothers and babies in future pregnancies, and for adhesion-relation problems in mothers at any time.To learn more about these differences, see
MORE DETAILED INFORMATION ABOUT SCAR-RELATED RISKS NOTED ABOVEClick below on HIGH, MODERATE, etc. to understand difference in level of risk between care options.What is the added likelihood that the scar will give way (uterine rupture) during a VBAC labor?Best research suggests that an extra 4.2 women experience a ruptured uterus in every 1,000 VBAC labors, compared with planned c-section deliveries. Thus, about 238 women would need to experience surgical birth to prevent one instance of uterine rupture during VBAC labors. While the scar giving way usually requires an urgent cesarean, loss of the baby is much less common (see next paragraph).Added likelihood for a woman with a known low-transverse (horizontal) scar: MODERATE for scar rupture compared with planned repeat c-section. What is the added likelihood that the baby will die as a result of the scar giving way (uterine rupture) during a VBAC labor?Best research suggests that about 1.9 more babies die due to problems with the scar in every 10,000 VBAC labors, compared with planned c-section deliveries. Thus, about 5,200 women would need to experience risks of surgical birth to prevent the death of 1 baby from scar problems during VBAC.Added likelihood for a woman with a known low-transverse (horizontal) scar: LOW for death of the baby around the time of birth compared with repeat c-section. What is the added likelihood of the scar giving way (uterine rupture) with any of these factors:
No added likelihood for scar rupture in a woman with unknown type of uterine scar, prior low vertical uterine incision, baby estimated to weigh more than 4,000 grams, or pregnancy extending past 40 weeks, in comparison with women planning VBAC without these factors. What is the added likelihood of the scar giving way (uterine rupture) with twin pregnancy or the use of external cephalic version (turning a baby in a buttocks- or feet-first (breech) position to a head-first position by manipulating the woman's belly)?While studies have not found an excess incidence of scar rupture in these situations, not enough women have been studied to rule out an increase. More detailed information on these issues can be found in Options: VBAC or Repeat C-Section.No currently known added likelihood for scar rupture in a woman with a twin pregnancy or a woman experiencing external version, in comparison with women planning VBAC without these factors. What is the added likelihood that a woman planning VBAC will require a hysterectomy compared with a woman planning repeat c-section?Although hysterectomy (surgical removal of the uterus) can result from uterine rupture in a VBAC labor, most studies find an excess of hysterectomies among women planning repeat c-section. However, this could be because those studies may have included cases where the c-section was planned for reasons that could increase the risk of complications during surgery such as the placenta overlaying the cervix (placenta previa). A study that took care to exclude women having planned repeat cesareans for medical reasons found no difference in the percentages of women having hysterectomies.No apparent added likelihood for hysterectomy for a woman planning VBAC compared with a woman planning repeat c-section. How may a growing number of uterine scars affect future pregnancies and births?The likelihood of the following problems grows as the number of previous cesareans (and c-section scars) grows:
The following risks for mothers are worse after one cesarean and may or may not grow as the number of c-section scars grow: fertility problems, ectopic pregnancy (pregnancy growing outside the uterus), and placental abruption (placenta detaches before birth). The following risks for babies are worse after one cesarean and may or may not grow as the number of c-section scars grows: being born too early (preterm), being born too small (low birthweight), having a physical abnormality or injury to the brain or spinal cord, and dying before birth (stillbirth) or shortly after birth. Scarring and adhesion tissue often increase as the the number of cesareans increases, creating greater and greater challenges for any future surgical procedures in the area. We did not find information to clarify whether the likelihood of the following adhesion-related problems grows as the number of cesareans grows: ongoing pelvic pain and risk for twisted and blocked bowel in women. Primary Reference: |
||